Two Common Mistakes Cost at least 2-3 Points of Net Profit Every Year

Most, if not all, are now caught up in the summer building season to make serious money for their component divisions. However, far too many companies are allowing tens of thousands of dollars to be lost because of commonly accepted bad practices. Practices such as using non-precise labor estimations (e.g., board foot (BF) labor estimation) and establishing project pricing using the common cost markup method result in companies losing at a minimum 2 to 3 net profit points, yet most companies refuse to see the simple logic behind this issue. We should not allow our egos to blind us from using better practices when we can utilize simple math to challenge our long-held beliefs of what we consider are best practices. This can all be verified by using some basic numbers to quantify what I am premising.

CommonLabor
PieceCount

In addition, too many take offense at the idea of using something other than BF, which is ridiculous. Unless a company is using man-minutes properly, as derived from motion and time studies that are updated for existing equipment and practices, the labor estimation versus the actual for individual projects are all over the map. The common response for using BF is that the average over time works out. However, every production supervisor knows that BF is truly a poor estimation when comparing high BF projects with low setup times, such as pole barn trusses, to low BF projects, such as a complex hip roof system with multiple setups.

TDC Suggestion #1 - Here is a simple exercise any company can do to prove the validity of my statements for man-minutes versus other units, such as BF. Track the actual labor for each assembly crew in man-minutes and BF. You can track via handwritten timesheets and then record the data in a spreadsheet for simplicity. Then compare which more accurately represents what you expected the time to be. If you are using anything other than properly derived man-minutes, you will find that individual batches of trusses have wide swings compared to proper man-minutes. The so-called “average” that many have been using all these years was more like a shotgun instead of a rifle when estimating labor. For companies that have limited capacity, have competent competition and want to make more net profits, why is verifying the accuracy of labor estimation such a hard sell for so many? The labor accuracy is needed to fix the flawed pricing that most are using.

Keith Myers of Woodhaven Lumber & Millwork
Lakewood, NJ

“BF seems to be the national standard for truss manufacturers mainly because that’s what the software has typically reported. Additionally, lumber yards always deal with BF. The truth is, we pay labor dollars for time, not pieces, nor BF. Whether I have a 2x10 or a 2x4 wedge, it takes the same amount of time to pick it up and install it into a truss. When attempting to build a pricing model within a costing program, one needs lumber, plates, and labor. Labor is a measure of time, which is paid in dollars. Those dollars can be calculated easily with the proper data. It takes more time to build a 32-foot attic truss than a 32-foot fink, and the costing model should reflect that fact.”

I asked Keith, “Are you using the time standards for MM that I provided you during the consultation and, if so, how have they worked out for you compared to BF?” Keith replied, “Your time standards are perfect. They are far more accurate than BF. We are much more comfortable with the MM for the estimation of labor for both the pricing and shop scheduling. BF is just too unreliable for our needs. No more educated guessing for our costing and pricing.”

Note that proper productivity incentive programs trying to use anything other than man-minutes are seriously flawed and will only produce mediocre benefits at best. See https://todd-drummond.com/incentives/

The fallacy of a cost markup to derive a project’s margin and, therefore, the overall price is costing many companies dearly. Instead, a company should be renting the tables to its customers instead of marking up the cost of the projects.

Many are mistaken if they think a company can make a consistent net profit weekly if it applies a cost markup. A cost markup is undercutting the daily margin earnings when it is processing orders with a high labor time (lots of man-minutes) and yet also have a low material cost project (hip roof versus AG trusses).

TDC_Formula
SpareCapacity

Everyone should always use cost markup to generate what they think the competition is charging for a price, but your margin’s baseline should be calculated this way:

Margin Baseline = $ Rate * Man-Minutes

Man-Minutes = Table + Saw + Support (Shop Only)

Does not include any office, trucking or admin personnel

Sales price = ($ Rate * Man-Minutes) + Material + Labor + Shipping

TDC Suggestions #2 – Compare the actual labor of the shop labor (at least the table of man-minutes) to that of the gross margin to derive a Margin/Man-Minute for past orders. Then tally the daily gross margin dollars for the day, week, and month. Hopefully, everyone can see what I am driving at for this exercise. If you start paying attention to the margin dollars per man-minute, it will:

  • Allow low margin/man-minute projects to go to your competition and therefore not tie up your company’s assets on low margin/man-minute orders.
    • Allow low margin/man-minute orders only for spare capacity.
  • Make more net profits by focusing on higher margin/man-minute orders!

The combination of properly estimated labor using man-minutes, plus calculating your project based on the same man-minutes instead of a cost markup will make any company more net profit. It happens every time. Now, is your company doing this already or are long-held beliefs and practices going to prevent your group from at least proving which method is best?

Gordon Tober, Co-Owner, and GM
Leduc, AB Canada

"In recent years, the market for truss manufacturing in Alberta has changed considerably. Our market has become extremely competitive by the excess of manufacturing capacity in comparison to the demand. As any manufacturer would do, the constant market changes require us to evolve to stay competitive and profitable. The one area that started this process was our desire to refine our estimating techniques. Our equipment had changed dramatically over the years but our bidding time estimations had not been properly updated. Todd provided us with time standards that were specific to the equipment that we use. This information allowed us to estimate our jobs with a dramatically increased level of accuracy on each project, regardless of its level of complexity. The time standards also gave us the information to measure our production and establish target output for each workstation in our shop.

However, time standards were not the only thing he helped us improve. He opened our eyes to all areas of our operation. He offered suggestions for lean manufacturing practices for both the shop and office. We are very pleased with the road map he has provided us with to improve just about everything we do. We are certain that these improvements will result in greater profits.
I recommend Todd’s consultation to any truss manufacturer looking to improve the bottom line.
The time and money were well worth it for improving our profitability."

When you want more than hype, Todd Drummond Consulting (TDC) is your best source for learning about the very best and latest practices to keep your company competitive. Proven real-world expertise that goes far beyond what many expect and has proven consulting services for well over a hundred clients. Whether you are a new or longtime operation, save your company a great deal of time and money by getting professional lean manufacturing help and training to improve all of your processes, not just manufacturing. TDC uses proven and practical lean manufacturing best practices combined with industrial engineering principles that include refined time standard man-minutes for truss manufacturing. So, before you buy equipment, get TDC’s advice! TDC does not receive referral fees from any equipment or plate vendors, and you can trust TDC for unbiased vendor and equipment recommendations shaped only by customer experiences. Please don't take my word about TDC’s services though, read the public testimonials many current and past clients who have decades of expertise and experience have been willing to give: https://todd-drummond.com/testimonials/.

Todd Drummond Consulting LLC

Copyrights © 2002-2019  Todd-Drummond.com

Todd Drummond Consulting LLC
Copyrights © 2002 - 2019 Todd-Drummond.com

(603) 748-1051
todd@todd-drummond.com
www.linkedin.com/in/todrummond